🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.